Questions and Answers :
Macintosh :
Work units for Mac
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
I'm keen to do some work units for this project on my Mac. Are there likely to be any available in the near future please? |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,782,517 RAC: 20 |
Yes, we are planning an app for Mac! |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,782,517 RAC: 20 |
You can also participate in the original project with Mac (https://covid.si/en/), the installation instructions are here. But we want to issue a BOINC application as well and you are very welcome in the BOINC project. |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 20 Posts: 14 Credit: 4,698 RAC: 0 |
You can also participate in the original project with Mac (https://covid.si/en/), the installation instructions are here. But we want to issue a BOINC application as well and you are very welcome in the BOINC project. Can I help or assist you in porting the application and wrapper to macOS? |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,782,517 RAC: 20 |
It would be good :) Please contact me via nikitina (at) krc.karelia.ru or give me your e-mail and I will write you. |
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 20 Posts: 32 Credit: 847,529 RAC: 51 |
Great to see that you plan for future support of MacOS. And thanks Dosch for volunteering to help with porting the app! |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,782,517 RAC: 20 |
Many thanks to Dotsch for porting the app to MacOS! Now it is in project's app versions and should work. :) |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 20 Posts: 14 Credit: 4,698 RAC: 0 |
Tested the new application and get an exec error: <core_client_version>7.16.11</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message> <stderr_txt> 14:42:20 (99301): wrapper (7.5.26013): starting 14:42:20 (99301): wrapper: running get_fraction_done (ligands.sdf docking_log fraction_done 500 TARGET_PRO_1.mol2) 14:42:20 (99301): wrapper: running worker ($PWD 500 TARGET_PRO_1.mol2) execv() failed: : Permission denied 14:42:21 (99301): worker exited; CPU time 0.016650 14:42:21 (99301): app exit status: 0x6c00 14:42:21 (99301): called boinc_finish(195) </stderr_txt> ]]> Don't know why... Searching for the problem... |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,782,517 RAC: 20 |
I think it's my fault, I did not put execution permission on worker script. Sorry! Now this is repaired. |
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 20 Posts: 32 Credit: 847,529 RAC: 51 |
That's awesome. Thank you so much Dotsch for volunteering and porting this application this quickly. Great job! Just downloaded my first WUs on a MacOS system. |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 20 Posts: 14 Credit: 4,698 RAC: 0 |
bozz4science, does it work on your Mac? Still got some strange errors. The script errors out. I guess the script is broken. Natalia, can you please, verify the sha256 checksums of the rbdock script one the donwload : Got this from the project: 342937a4c92beba914e395b40c1f7ee09596ccb31b75ad6f2f4acd4ce11a2098 ./rbdock-boinc_11.5_x86_64-apple-darwin.sh.new My working script: 651b06d97b3300825e689ca6fc72ee6e55e1bf5d4b14607a18375f5fb4148df0 ./rbdock-boinc_11.5_x86_64-apple-darwin.sh.ok |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,782,517 RAC: 20 |
bozz4science, does it work on your Mac? On the server it is 342937a4c92beba914e395b40c1f7ee09596ccb31b75ad6f2f4acd4ce11a2098, and on your script it is 6b0648a6e0812d59033b6ee45d2e25cf7bd0e7bfa1690041e36170d469bd0bed Can you resend me the working script please? |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 20 Posts: 14 Credit: 4,698 RAC: 0 |
Send you a mail... |
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 20 Posts: 32 Credit: 847,529 RAC: 51 |
No. Unfortunately all 8 WU errored out almost immediately (5-30 sec runtime each). All "stderr" files state an error 195 (0x000000C3) EXIT_CHILD_FAILED. Pls see for reference the following WU f.ex. https://fightcovid.boinc.ru/sidocktest/result.php?resultid=174785 I paste the stderr file here for convenience. <core_client_version>7.16.11</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message> <stderr_txt> 18:08:47 (4592): wrapper (7.5.26013): starting 18:08:47 (4592): wrapper: running get_fraction_done (ligands.sdf docking_log fraction_done 500 TARGET_PRO_1.mol2) 18:08:47 (4592): wrapper: running worker ($PWD 500 TARGET_PRO_1.mol2) /bin/bash: : No such file or directory 18:08:48 (4592): worker exited; CPU time 0.015192 18:08:48 (4592): app exit status: 0x7f00 18:08:48 (4592): called boinc_finish(195) </stderr_txt> ]]> |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,782,517 RAC: 20 |
I created a new app version, let's hope it works :) |
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 20 Posts: 32 Credit: 847,529 RAC: 51 |
I’ll give it another shot and report back to you whether it works or not. Thanks for the quick bug fix! Edit: I am now ~15 min into the new MacOS supported WUs with version 11.06 and they seem to be crunching away just fine. Will get back to you once I know if they finish and validate successfully. Seems you all did a good job of porting this application. |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 20 Posts: 14 Credit: 4,698 RAC: 0 |
Thank you booz4science! My Mac is also crunching with the new application. |
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 20 Posts: 32 Credit: 847,529 RAC: 51 |
Just wanted to update you shortly. First MacOS WU (11.06 app version) recently finished and validated. Runtime seems to be in line what can be expected from the results returned so far from my other machines. No hiccups whatsoever. Seems to be working just fine https://fightcovid.boinc.ru/sidocktest/result.php?resultid=177970 Looking forward to contribute with my Mac as well. Thanks again for helping the development of the MacOS version of the app Dotsch! |
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 20 Posts: 32 Credit: 847,529 RAC: 51 |
Just wanted to check back to you shortly as I the majority of my tasks reporting ~70 MB (±5 MB) physical memory but ~4.15 GB (±150 MB) virtual memory. It seems to me that my Mac system is currently overwhelmed by the RAM requirements of the tasks. Should I scale them back to address this, i.e. running 2 instead of 4 tasks simultaneously? I am crunching on a system with 8 GB RAM. |
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 20 Posts: 339 Credit: 25,715,738 RAC: 5,237 |
bozz4science, hi! Under Linux we see ~78 .. 80 Mb RAM - both for Virtual and Reserved. What gives out command top -b -n 1 -p ? Thank you! |
©2024 SiDock@home Team