Message boards :
Number crunching :
Something wrong with the validator?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 26 Oct 20 Posts: 53 Credit: 2,520,836 RAC: 0 |
Huge number of resends for the 3rd, 4th etc time. The returned tasks are all ending into the status Completed, validation inconclusive |
Send message Joined: 18 Jan 21 Posts: 1 Credit: 16,834 RAC: 0 |
I am new for this project but all my tasks today has the same status Completed, validation inconclusive |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 21 Posts: 76 Credit: 38,846,214 RAC: 0 |
Seems excessive. Are there any that actually finish at 4,5 or 5,6 or 6,7 or 7,8??? max # of error/total/success tasks 8, 8, 8 I have 10,227 WUs Completed, validation inconclusive waiting for someone to get lucky as 7 & 8. |
Send message Joined: 26 Oct 20 Posts: 53 Credit: 2,520,836 RAC: 0 |
My last task returned that got the status Valid was at 22 Jan 2021, 12:56:28 UTC. All tasks thereafter got the status: Completed, validation inconclusive. The highest number for initial replication, I could find so far is 6. |
Send message Joined: 12 Jan 21 Posts: 13 Credit: 2,513,888 RAC: 0 |
Same here. This needs to be fixed,soon. |
Send message Joined: 3 Nov 20 Posts: 41 Credit: 1,828,501 RAC: 211 |
I'm seeing this problem, also. Is the validator capable of marking ANY results as valid? I suspect it is not, and needs major changes. |
Send message Joined: 20 Jan 21 Posts: 1 Credit: 9,853,575 RAC: 35,126 |
I've got replication as high as 9. This is lots of wasted resources that people are donating, not a very nice approach. |
Send message Joined: 5 Dec 20 Posts: 8 Credit: 3,009,342 RAC: 4,188 |
Calm down, its a relatively new project with a big growth of users in short time. sometimes errors just happen. |
Send message Joined: 23 Dec 20 Posts: 20 Credit: 1,360,768 RAC: 0 |
I have an overlap of valid/inconclusive tasks around 14:36 UTC. Also some Invalid foa all 8 (Completed, can't validate). Plus this one with 2 valid then inconclusives! TARGET_3_nb3di_006543_2 https://www.sidock.si/sidock/workunit.php?wuid=2803646 Paul. |
Send message Joined: 16 Jan 21 Posts: 4 Credit: 2,445,994 RAC: 591 |
count me in RxDock on BOINC v1.00 https://www.sidock.si/sidock/workunit.php?wuid=2811533 and also CurieMarieDock on BOINC v1.01 https://www.sidock.si/sidock/workunit.php?wuid=2824646 are invalid with 8 error results when the validator is not changed or working wrong, than the source data has wrong parameters or data Matthias |
Send message Joined: 30 Oct 20 Posts: 57 Credit: 9,112,528 RAC: 0 |
On 22 January, I had 706 valid and 680 invalid. Whether that is too high to conitnue is a matter of personal judgement. It is 706 more than if I weren't doing them, but then there are other options too. I hope it is fixed soon. I have three machines on it now. Maybe I will just leave one on to see when it is fixed. |
Send message Joined: 26 Oct 20 Posts: 53 Credit: 2,520,836 RAC: 0 |
It seems that the validator is working again. All tasks are validating now, except tasks that reached the maximum replication of 8. Those finished tasks got the state 'Can't validate' :( |
Send message Joined: 19 Jan 21 Posts: 4 Credit: 141,197 RAC: 0 |
Calm down, its a relatively new project with a big growth of users in short time.I see no significant lack of calm. In fact, yours is the only transgressive post that I can identify, the only one that presumptuously tells people what to do. I'd tell you what to do in turn, but that would not be "kid friendly." I have to agree with this response. There are a number of good Distributed Computing projects. I am most willing to donate my CPU and GPU time, but not for naught. True, a learning curve is to be expected. However, the administrator(s) did not appear to be addressing the problem, at least not in the forums. LLP, PhD Prof Engr. |
Send message Joined: 16 Jan 21 Posts: 4 Credit: 2,445,994 RAC: 591 |
looks like something is going on I found some results that went from invalid with to many result to valid for all 8 tasks of the result https://www.sidock.si/sidock/workunit.php?wuid=2802060 https://www.sidock.si/sidock/workunit.php?wuid=2837016 Matthias |
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 20 Posts: 337 Credit: 25,678,588 RAC: 9,144 |
Hi folks! Some tasks was revalidated. |
Send message Joined: 28 Jan 21 Posts: 6 Credit: 561,720 RAC: 0 |
Hi A couple of things that concern me:
All of the WUs for my tasks seem to have been given out 2 or 3 times
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jan 21 Posts: 6 Credit: 561,720 RAC: 0 |
Hi OK, so both of these points are a result of this project being configured with quorum=2. Nothing gets validated until 2 hosts have returned identical results. And most of my tasks that are still pending validation haven't yet reached their deadline and were also given out to a host that hasn't been online for quite a while. The other project I am contributing to has quorum=1 so it doesn't happen there. I'm curious how necessary it really is to gain consensus on each WU. Presumably it is there for a reason but it is a huge overhead... |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 21 Posts: 24 Credit: 30,971,182 RAC: 301 |
cpalmer wrote: cpalmer wrote:The owner of these hosts is waiting for the upcoming contest to start.Quite a few of my tasks are being validated within an hour, but others are still pending validation after 4 daysAnd most of my tasks that are still pending validation haven't yet reached their deadline and were also given out to a host that hasn't been online for quite a while. (BTW, there were and are other projects in which workunits can easily take several months until 2+ valid results came together. E.g. SETI@home, QuChemPedIA. It happens comparably quickly at SiDock, actually.) |
©2024 SiDock@home Team