can this result be correct?
Message boards :
Number crunching :
can this result be correct?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 10 Dec 20 Posts: 24 Credit: 10,767,590 RAC: 0      
|
This machine was running multiple WU's and none were taking up all the cores, and 40+ other WU finished today, so how can this WU have have 45 days of run time on a single core in 2 days? 77522270 49580149 15 Jan 2023, 3:32:33 UTC 17 Jan 2023, 22:39:26 UTC Completed and validated 241,613.00 3,915,919.00 1,647.69 CurieMarieDock 0.2.0 long tasks v2.00 Are the WU's multithreaded? Still, 45 other WU's completed in the same day so not sure where it found cores to multithread to. |
|
Send message Joined: 10 Dec 20 Posts: 24 Credit: 10,767,590 RAC: 0
|
There were 2 results with that impossible run time of over 45 days within 1 day on a single thread. Also, there were 15 that ended in error states yesterday. 7 that couldn't validate. Given that 91 completed, that's a 19.5% failure rate. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 20 Posts: 337 Credit: 25,677,139 RAC: 9,236  
|
This machine was running multiple WU's and none were taking up all the cores, and 40+ other WU finished today, so how can this WU have have 45 days of run time on a single core in 2 days? Answered in message 1876. |
©2024 SiDock@home Team